Free Horse Newsletter!!
Your Email:
The latest horse features... No spam, totally free!
Horse Information
Horse Articles
Horse Training
Health & Care 
Riding & Safety
Horse Breeds
Dictionary
Horse Names
Unusual Q&A
Color Genetics
 
Horses for Sale
Message Forum
Horse Pictures
 
Horse Fun!
Free Horse Games
Jokes & Humor
Stories & Poems
Graphics & Clipart
Horse Quotes
 
Horse Links
About / Contact
Submit Your Writing
Advertise

 

=================================================

Victory for Horse Advocates!
6/8/05
Sweeney Amendment passes; Removes federal funding of inspectors at horse slaughter plants.

To see how your representative voted, visit:
http://clerk.house.gov/evs/2005/roll233.xml

You can find your representative by going to Congress.org Please take a moment to thank them if they voted 'yes', and express your disappointment if they voted 'no'.
Letters make the biggest impact; Calls and emails are good too. Remember to thank Whitfield (R-KY), Spratt (D-SC), Rahall (D-WV) and Sweeney (R-NY) for their support.


Today horse owners and advocates have won a victory in the 269-158 passage of an amendment to an appropriations bill by John Sweeney (R-New York) that would help to put an end to the slaughter of American horses for human consumption overseas. The amendment will remove federal funding of inspectors at the 3 remaining foreign-owned horse slaughter plans in the US.

If a companion bill is passed by the Senate, the Sweeney amendment, co-sponsored by Ed Whitfield (R-Kentucky), Jack Spratt (D-South Carolina) and Nick Rahall II (D-West Virginia), will trigger a 12-month shutdown of those slaughterhouses when a new fiscal year begins October 1.

"The vote was a major victory and shows the overwhelming support in Congress to end this brutal practice. The amazing outpouring of public support helped to make this possible and I thank everyone who supported our efforts today," Whitfield said.

Thoroughbred industry leader John Hettinger, who has spearheaded the battle against slaughter, said, "It’s the most satisfying moment in my 33 years in the horse business."

Horse slaughter is opposed by horse owners for several reasons. For one, it provides irresponsible breeders and owners a way to quickly get rid of their unwanted or injured horses instead of properly caring for them. For another thing, many stolen horses end up in slaughter plants. Although horse theft might sound like a thing of the past, it's quite common and heartbreaking when it happens, as most owners never see their animals again.

But it's not Americans that are killing or eating the horses; Most find it repulsive given the significant historical, cultural, and recreational value of the horse. The horse slaughter plants are operated by and for foreigners, at Americans' expense. Horse meat is a delicacy in places such as France, Germany, and Japan, and it's exported for human consumpion.
For this reason, the animals are killed in an unconventional manner considered by many to be inhumane. Horses are generally euthanized via lethal injection, or in emergency cases, shot in the head to render a quick death. However, in a slaughter plant, the horses must be 'bled' to make the meat safe for human consumption. First a horse is herded into a 'kill box', and then a 4" nail is driven into the horse's head. The blow is supposed to render the animal unconscious. The horse is then hoisted into the air by a chain around the hind leg and in some cases still alive as the throat is cut and the horse is 'bled'.

Not all horse owners support a ban on horse slaughter. Some people have concerns that it may leave horses with no place to go, or may increase instances of horse abuse, saying that irresponsible people who might otherwise slaughter the horses may instead keep them in abusive conditions. They fear that horses too old or sick may not be euthanized properly, but may instead be left to starve.

However, horse advocates point out that although some people call it a 'necessary evil', it's hard to make an argument for its necessity. The number of horses slaughtered is a tiny fraction of the horse population-- less than half of one percent ( .07% to be exact)-- which can hardly make an impact on the nationwide population.

If ending horse slaughter were to create a large number of ill or old horses with no place to go, there is a humane alternative that few people discuss: Rendering plants. Rendering plants can pick up the bodies of euthanized horses and turn them into pet food or fertilizer, thus eliminating the fear that somehow thousands of horse bodies will pile up and cause polution.


It's also very important to note that major changes have already occured in the horse slaughter industry. From 1990 to 2002, the number of horses slaughtered dropped about 90%-- a huge margin-- but still did not result in an increase in abuse or have any other negative impact. If horse slaughter were banned tomorrow, the drop would be minor compared to the changes that have already taken place.


Polls have shown that Americans are overwhelmingly against the slaughter of horses, with 60-90% opposing it depending on the areas polled.


You can help by writing to your representatives and letting them know how you feel. Visit Congress.org to find and write to your representatives.

 

 


Search The Ultimate Horse Site or the web!


New Website:
Ultimate Horse Fun

>advertise here

 
> What did you think of this page?
< Excellent <Good <OK <Poor <Bad
Submit & get our free newsletter! NO SPAM!

Your Email:


> Share This Page!
You can't copy our content without permission, but you may share a link to this page.... Email it! Post it in message boards! Or just link to it from your site... use the URL below:
 
Search:
Web UltimateHorseSite.com
© COPYRIGHT Ultimate Horse Sites Inc. 2000-2005
Content is copyright and not to be taken, copied, or used in any way without written permission.
Want to use our content? Write for permission please: info@ultimatehorsesite.com
Use of the terms "Ultimate Horse Site", "The Ultimate Horse Site", "Ultimate Horse", "UltimateHorse", "The Ultimate Horse" have been in use since 2000 and use of variations of our name for any reason is prohibited.

COPYRIGHT - DISCLAIMER - PRIVACY POLICY - LINKING - USING OUR CONTENT - CONTENT SUBMISSIONS